“This flight starts and ends at different airports.”
Well, that’s reassuring…
I just wrote a thing in Emacs that others might find useful: Although the code’s documentation gives a short example,Continue reading
The number twelve is a lie; I just wanted to hook you. More than a year ago, my friend JimContinue reading
There’s a petition circulating that is essentially a public indictment of Richard Stallman. More than half of the initial signersContinue reading
% So, why are we not using \appdxsection here? % % Sit down, my child, and you shall hear aContinue reading
I decided to try out this lossless text-compression demonstration site by Fabrice Bellard. It uses GPT-2 natural language generation andContinue reading
Have you noticed how Trump consistently says that “we can’t let the cure be worse than the problem“? (emphasis mine)Continue reading
I wrote a semi-personal post over at QuestionCopyright.org on why the National Emergency Library is a good thing. (Instead ofContinue reading
Update (2019-11-25): Audrey Eschright has made a link roundup of “pieces I’ve been reading on the topic of modern freeContinue reading
Thanks to user lamayonnaise in this Reddit, I was able to solve the problem described below, which I encountered whenContinue reading
What they really meant was: “this *trip* starts and ends at different airports”, which is unusual. Most airlines expect journeys to be perfectly round-trip. Just bad wording on Orbitz’ part.
Aaaaah. Thank you.
I wonder what would happen if I tried to book a flight from and to the same airport, though. Let’s see, how about a round-trip from SFO to SFO?
I kind of like their error message strategy: a human-readable message, followed by a code clearly intended for their programmers. Maybe Subversion should do the same thing?
The Mount Everest sight seeing flight I went on a few years ago was labeled on the boarding pass as “from KTM to KTM,” I think.
Hah! So it is possible!