“This flight starts and ends at different airports.”
Well, that’s reassuring…
Karl Fogel's blog
That’s it, folks. The title is the whole post.
Continue readingIf your computer can’t lie to other computers, then it’s not yours. This is a fundamental principle of free and
Continue readingI just wrote a thing in Emacs that others might find useful: Although the code’s documentation gives a short example,
Continue readingThe number twelve is a lie; I just wanted to hook you. More than a year ago, my friend Jim
Continue readingThere’s a petition circulating that is essentially a public indictment of Richard Stallman. More than half of the initial signers
Continue reading% So, why are we not using \appdxsection here? % % Sit down, my child, and you shall hear a
Continue readingI decided to try out this lossless text-compression demonstration site by Fabrice Bellard. It uses GPT-2 natural language generation and
Continue readingHave you noticed how Trump consistently says that “we can’t let the cure be worse than the problem“? (emphasis mine)
Continue readingI wrote a semi-personal post over at QuestionCopyright.org on why the National Emergency Library is a good thing. (Instead of
Continue reading
What they really meant was: “this *trip* starts and ends at different airports”, which is unusual. Most airlines expect journeys to be perfectly round-trip. Just bad wording on Orbitz’ part.
Aaaaah. Thank you.
I wonder what would happen if I tried to book a flight from and to the same airport, though. Let’s see, how about a round-trip from SFO to SFO?
I kind of like their error message strategy: a human-readable message, followed by a code clearly intended for their programmers. Maybe Subversion should do the same thing?
The Mount Everest sight seeing flight I went on a few years ago was labeled on the boarding pass as “from KTM to KTM,” I think.
Hah! So it is possible!